[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 11/13] dt-bindings: power: add PX30 SoCs header for power-domain

Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018, 17:18:12 CEST schrieb Tao Huang:
> Hi Heiko:
> On 2018年05月12日 06:11, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Here I have a naming question. When looking at the vendor kernel
> > it looks like the px30 is largely related to the rk3326.
> > (rk3326.dtsi includeing the px30.dtsi)
> >
> > What is the reason for basing the naming on the px30 this time? And could
> > we possibly keep to rkXXXX names for the basic things in the kernel, thus
> > keeping the pxXX as second name, like with the other px-variants before?
> PX30 and RK3326 are different chips. PX30 has more features. You can simply
> think that RK3326 is a subset of PX30. The RK3326 is more like a PX30
> derivative chip. This is not the same as the previous chips. So we use PX30
> instead of RK3326 for name, and the opening document is only for PX30, we
> think this is more convenient for developers.

ok, sounds reasonable :-) ... So we'll stay with the PX30.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-13 22:53    [W:0.087 / U:1.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site