lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches
Hi all,

On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:47:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:03:46 +0900 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input.
> > > > I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible
> > > > idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back
> > > > home.
> >
> > > Since Stephen merges all -fixes branches first, before merging all the
> > > -next branches, he already generates that as part of linux-next. All
> > > he'd need to do is push that intermediate state out to some
> > > linux-fixes branch for consumption by test bots.
>
> Good idea ... I will see what I can do.

See my announcement of a pending-fixes branch in linux-next (on LKML
and others)

> I currently have 44 such fixes branches. More welcome!

We are up to 55.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-12 06:38    [W:0.308 / U:4.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site