lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] tty: implement led triggers
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:25:21PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/18 12:14, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > @@ -499,6 +500,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > > > struct tty_buffer *head = buf->head;
> > > > > > struct tty_buffer *next;
> > > > > > int count;
> > > > > > + unsigned long delay = 50 /* ms */;
> > > > >
> > > > > Comment after the semicolon?
> > > >
> > > > Given that this comment is about the 50 and not the delay member, I
> > > > prefer it before the ;.
> > >
> > > Hmm. I personally find it hard to read and can only find about 30
> > > instances of this comment style (for assignments) in the kernel. And
> > > arguably the comment applies equally well to the delay variable in this
> > > case too.
> >
> > It is not too traditional, but I believe it makes sense....
> >
> > (and yes, I wish we had kernel in Rust, so we could have real units
> > attached to our variables...)
>
> Well, the variable itself could always be named "delay_ms" if it's really
> that important.

FTR: That's what I did for v3.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-12 21:01    [W:0.046 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site