[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 5/9] vsprintf: Factor out %p[iI] handler as ip_addr_string()
On Thu 2018-04-05 08:58:16, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/04/18 10:58), Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > Also it is better to warn about unknown specifier instead of falling
> > back to the %p behavior. It will help people to understand what is
> > going wrong. They expect the IP address and not a pointer anyway
> > in this situation.
> >
> May be. If one sees a hashed value where IP address/device name/etc
> was meant to be then it's already a sign that something is wrong.
> Those WARN_ONCE that you have added make things simpler, I agree.
> A quick question, what happens on !CONFIG_BUG systems (where we have
> no_printk() WARN)?

People with CONFIG_BUG disabled will miss much more important
warnings. IMHO, an unreported typo in printk format will be
one of their smallest problems.

Best Regards,

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-05 16:15    [W:0.106 / U:2.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site