lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: INFO: rcu detected stall in bitmap_parselist
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:58:46AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Yury Norov wrote:
> > Hi Tetsuo,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 09:21:43PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Yury, are you OK with this patch?
> > >
> > >
> > > >From 7f21827cdfe9780b4949b22bcd19efa721b463d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 21:12:10 +0900
> > > Subject: [PATCH] lib/bitmap: Rewrite __bitmap_parselist().
> > >
> > > syzbot is catching stalls at __bitmap_parselist() [1]. The trigger is
> > >
> > > unsigned long v = 0;
> > > bitmap_parselist("7:,", &v, BITS_PER_LONG);
> >
> > Could you add this case to the test_bitmap_parselist()?
> >
> > > which results in hitting infinite loop at
> > >
> > > while (a <= b) {
> > > off = min(b - a + 1, used_size);
> > > bitmap_set(maskp, a, off);
> > > a += group_size;
> > > }
> > >
> > > due to used_size == group_size == 0.
> > >
> > > Current code is difficult to read due to too many flag variables.
> > > Let's rewrite it.
> >
> > I also don't like current implementation of bitmap_parselist(), but
> > discussion on new code may take some time. Can you submit minimal
> > fix in separated patch to let people discuss your new implementation
> > without rush?
>
> OK. Then you can write the patch. You know current code better than I.

Done.

> > > @@ -485,6 +485,58 @@ int bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_print_to_pagebuf);
> > >
> > > +static bool get_uint(const char **buf, unsigned int *res)
> > > +{
> > > + const char *p = *buf;
> > > +
> > > + if (!isdigit(*p))
> > > + return false;
> > > + *res = simple_strtoul(p, (char **) buf, 10);
> >
> > In comment to simple_strtoul(): "This function is obsolete. Please
> > use kstrtoul instead."
>
> I intentionally choose simple_strtoul() because next delimiter (e.g. '-')
> starts at returned address. kstrtoul() fails if next letter starts.

OK, but then it should be explained in comment, I think.

> > > + return p < *buf;
>
> I think I should limit to "0 <= *res <= INT_MAX" range in order to avoid
> overflow at start += group_size.
>
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __bitmap_parse_one_chunk(const char *buf, unsigned long *maskp,
> > > + const unsigned int nmaskbits)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int start;
> > > + unsigned int end;
> > > + unsigned int group_size;
> > > + unsigned int used_size;
> > > +
> > > + while (*buf && isspace(*buf))
> > > + buf++;
> > > + if (!get_uint(&buf, &start))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (*buf == '-') {
> > > + buf++;
> > > + if (!get_uint(&buf, &end) || start > end)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (*buf == ':') {
> > > + buf++;
> > > + if (!get_uint(&buf, &used_size) || *buf++ != '/' ||
> > > + !get_uint(&buf, &group_size) ||
> > > + used_size > group_size)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > So this is still not safe against "1-10:0/0", or I miss something?
> > (This is another testcase we should add to test_bitmap.c)
>
> Indeed. We need to make more testcases.
>
> > > + while (buflen && !err) {
> > > + char *cp;
> > > + char tmpbuf[256];
> > > + unsigned int size = min(buflen,
> > > + (unsigned int) sizeof(tmpbuf) - 1);
> > > +
> > > + if (!is_user)
> > > + memcpy(tmpbuf, buf, size);
> > > + else if (copy_from_user(tmpbuf, (const char __user __force *)
> > > + buf, size))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> >
> > This is not safe against this:
> > "[250 whitespaces] 567-890:123/456"
>
> Do we need to accept such insane entry?

This is how current implementation works - no limit on number of whitespaces
before and after the cunk. It's userspace interface, and we should be careful
adding new limitations. God forbid us break userspace. :-)

It looks insane, but this kind of things is quite possible if input string
is the result of heavy scripting.

> > And it will be Schlemiel the painter's-styled algorithm for input like:
> > "1,2,3,4, ... ,98,99,100".
> >
> > I think we need something like __bitmap_parse_get_chunk() to copy
> > coma-separated substrings.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-04 18:53    [W:0.052 / U:57.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site