lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [crypto-chtls] Supicious code in chtls_io
From
Date


On 4/4/2018 3:16 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While doing some static analysis I came across the following piece of code at drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_io.c:1203:
>
> 1203 if (!size)
> 1204 break;
> 1205
> 1206 if (unlikely(ULP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags & ULPCB_FLAG_NO_APPEND))
> 1207 push_frames_if_head(sk);
> 1208 continue;
> 1209
> 1210 set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
> 1211 }
>
>
> The issue is that in the code above, set_bit is never reached due to the 'continue' statement at line 1208.
>
> I wonder if the actual intention of the code was something like this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_io.c b/drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_io.c
> index 5a75be4..a949a6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_io.c
> @@ -1203,9 +1203,10 @@ int chtls_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
> if (!size)
> break;
>
> - if (unlikely(ULP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags & ULPCB_FLAG_NO_APPEND))
> + if (unlikely(ULP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags & ULPCB_FLAG_NO_APPEND)) {
> push_frames_if_head(sk);
> - continue;
> + continue;
> + }
>
> set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
> }
>
>
> What do you think?
Thanks for pointing, there is additional change required. I will send the patch once the window opens.
>
> I can send a proper patch for this.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-04 12:02    [W:0.037 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site