[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] exit: Make unlikely case in mm_update_next_owner() more scalable
On Thu 26-04-18 11:19:33, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Michal Hocko <> writes:
> > I've had a patch to remove owner few years back. It needed some work
> > to finish but maybe that would be a better than try to make
> > non-scalable thing suck less.
> I have a question. Would it be reasonable to just have a mm->memcg?
> That would appear to be the simplest solution to the problem.

I do not remember details. Have to re-read the whole thing again. Hope
to get to this soon but with the current jet lag and backlog from the
LSFMM I rather not promis anything. Going with mm->memcg would be the
most simple of course but I have a very vague recollection that it was
not possible. Maybe I misremember...

Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-26 21:28    [W:0.175 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site