[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/6] dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Andrzej Hajda <> wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo, Archit,
> On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Rob and Andrzej,
>>> On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
>>>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
>>>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with
>>>>> working example.
>>>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading
>>>>> to a happy end :)
>>>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function.
>>>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts.
>>>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C
>>>>> example.
>>>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks
>>>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches.
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Andrzej
>>>>> Andrzej Hajda (5):
>>>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
>>>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector
>>>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms
>>>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector
>>>>> extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
>>>>> Maciej Purski (1):
>>>>> drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
>>>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's
>>>> acks for dts part).
>>>> Now I have a question how to merge them.
>>>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from
>>>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st.
>>>> I can merge it:
>>>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree.
>>>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
>>>> samsung-soc tree.
>>>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
>>> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1
>>> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej.
>> I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request.
>> [1]
>> Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.
> It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.

I also took v5:

There was no v6 in samsung-soc patchwork. Is it a problem for DTS?


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-07 12:23    [W:0.186 / U:0.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site