lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 07/25] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Add support to Q6ADM
From
Date
Thanks for the review,

On 01/03/18 21:24, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 04:58:19PM +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
>
>> +static struct copp *adm_find_copp(struct q6adm *adm, int port_idx,
>> + int copp_idx)
>> +{
>> + struct copp *c;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&adm->copps_list_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(c, &adm->copps_list, node) {
>> + if ((port_idx == c->afe_port) && (copp_idx == c->copp_idx)) {
>> + spin_unlock(&adm->copps_list_lock);
>> + return c;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&adm->copps_list_lock);
>
> We've again got this use of spinlocks here but no IRQ safety - what
> exactly is going on with the locking? In general all of the locking in
> this stuff is raising very serious alarm bells with me, I don't
> understand what is being protected against what and there's some very
> obvious bugs. We could probably use some documentation about what the
> locking is supposed to be doing.
>
I agree, there are locking issues here, Am revisiting them all before I
send a next version.

>> + case ADM_CMDRSP_DEVICE_OPEN_V5: {
>
>> + copp->id = open->copp_id;
>> + wake_up(&copp->wait);
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + default:
>
> This indentation is confusing.
>
I agree, will fix such instances in next version.

thanks,
srini

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-06 10:28    [W:0.070 / U:5.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site