lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] target: drop spin_lock_assert() + irqs_disabled() combo checks
On 2018-03-28 15:05:41 [+0000], Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The names of the two functions touched by patch 1/2 start with a double
> underscore. That by itself is already a hint that these should be called with
> a lock held (I know that this is not a universal convention in the Linux
> kernel). I'm fine either way - either with patch 1/2 as posted or patch 1/2
> with the above comment added.

Okay. In that case let me update 1/2.
But 2/2 with the comment as Steven suggested is still a no no for you?

> Bart.

Sebastian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-28 17:15    [W:0.116 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site