lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant
From
Date
Hi Vivek,

On 2018/3/28 12:37, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Yisheng
>
>
> On 3/28/2018 6:54 AM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> Hi Vivek,
>>
>> On 2018/3/13 16:55, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> +- power-domains: Specifiers for power domains required to be powered on for
>>> + the SMMU to operate, as per generic power domain bindings.
>>> +
>> In this patchset, power-domains is not used right? And you just do the clock gating,
>> but not power gating, right?
>
> We are handling the power-domains too. Please see the example in this binding doc.

I see, but I do not find the point in code of these patchset, do you mean PMIC(e.g mmcc)
will gate the power domain of SMMU(e.g. MDSS_GDSC of mmcc) when PMIC suspend?

>
>>
>> Another question is if smmu do power gating, it will reset some of its registers, so
>> it need save at suspend and restore at resume, right?
>
> Qualcomm implementation of the arm-smmu has the retenetion enabled. So the smmu doesn't
> loose state when power is pulled out of it.
> And now we are just selectively enabling the runtime pm. So only the platforms that can really
> support runtime pm can enable it.

Get it, thanks for your explain.

Thanks
Yisheng
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>>
>> Thanks
>> Yisheng
>>
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-28 08:12    [W:0.223 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site