lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 8/8] fs/aio: Use rcu_work instead of explicit rcu and work item
Hey,

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:28:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > flush_*work() guarantees to wait for the completion of the latest
> > instance of the work item which was visible to the caller. We can't
> > guarantee that w/o rcu_barrier().
>
> And this is what I can't understand.
>
> So let me repeat. Could you please describe a use-case which needs flush_rcuwork()
> with rcu_barrier() ?

So, if you skip that, flush_work() in itself won't wait for PENDING
bit at all. It'll return right away if the work item is waiting for
rcu grace period.

Thanks.

--
tejun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-27 17:55    [W:0.106 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site