lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:irq/core 12/13] drivers/irqchip/irq-vic.c:295:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_handle_irq'; did you mean 'vic_handle_irq'?
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:07:54 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:53:21 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Palmer,
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Zapped the commit as well...
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, I got the flu at ELC and have been offline for a bit. It looks
> > > like
> > > you've kept the IRQ and RISC-V patches, I'll fix up the others are
> > > re-submit
> > > them as a separate patch set.
> >
> > Not sure which patches are in flight at the moment. To get a clean build
> > on arm32 and arm64 randconfig kernels, I needed the fixup below
> > on top of linux-next (not meant to be applied like this, just for
> > reference).
>
> Thanks, I missed these during my original patch submission. I think the
> cleanest way to submit this is to spin a whole new patch set, including those
> that are already in tip. Would it be possible to just remove my IRQ cleanups
> from tip so I can try again?

The commits in tip right now are:

cc6c98485f8e ("RISC-V: Move to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER handler")
caacdbf4aa56 ("genirq: Add CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")

I surely can revert them, but I don't see how they would break arm or
anything else.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-27 07:28    [W:0.079 / U:7.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site