lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Regression with arm in next with stack protector
Date
Allwinner devices are OK, Exynos devices (except 4210) are OK.

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Tony Lindgren"<tony@atomide.com>;
Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 11:37 PM
To: "陈华才"<chenhc@lemote.com>;
Cc: "Andrew Morton"<akpm@linux-foundation.org>; "Fabio Estevam"<festevam@gmail.com>; "Stephen Rothwell"<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>; "Rich Felker"<dalias@libc.org>; "Russell King"<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>; "Yoshinori Sato"<ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Ralf Baechle"<ralf@linux-mips.org>; "linux-omap"<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; "James Hogan"<james.hogan@mips.com>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>;
Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

* 陈华才 <chenhc@lemote.com> [180326 06:59]:
> Hi, Tony and Fabio,
>
> Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.

Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross
compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have few more config
options enabled like LOCKDEP and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, but I
doubt they matter here :)

Then I'm using gcc-7.3.0 and binutils-2.30 built with the
buildall.git scripts:

git://git.infradead.org/users/segher/buildall.git

If you still need binaries, let me know.

Do you know which arm devices are working with your patch?

Regards,

Tony
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-27 10:39    [W:0.200 / U:1.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site