Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Adam Borowski <> | Date | Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:45:21 +0100 | Subject | [PATCH] vsprintf: avoid misleading "(null)" for %px |
| |
Like %pK already does, print "00000000" instead.
This confused people -- the convention is that "(null)" means you tried to dereference a null pointer as opposed to printing the address.
Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> --- lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c index 77ee6ced11b1..d7a708f82559 100644 --- a/lib/vsprintf.c +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, { const int default_width = 2 * sizeof(void *); - if (!ptr && *fmt != 'K') { + if (!ptr && *fmt != 'K' && *fmt != 'x') { /* * Print (null) with the same width as a pointer so it makes * tabular output look nice. -- 2.15.1
|  |