lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] Take mmap_min_addr into account while choosing unmapped address for x86-64.
On Tue 27-02-18 00:12:57, Ilya Smith wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c
> index 676774b9bb8d..1752fe5cb735 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/elf.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
>
> #include <asm/elf.h>
> #include <asm/compat.h>
> @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
> return addr;
>
> /* requested length too big for entire address space */
> - if (len > TASK_SIZE)
> + if (len > TASK_SIZE - mmap_min_addr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* No address checking. See comment at mmap_address_hint_valid() */
> @@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
>
> info.flags = VM_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN;
> info.length = len;
> - info.low_limit = PAGE_SIZE;
> + info.low_limit = max(PAGE_SIZE, mmap_min_addr);
> info.high_limit = get_mmap_base(0);
>
> /*

mmap_min_addr handling is a bit mess... As you say, we would return
EPERM rather than ENOMEM which can be confusing but depleting the
address space like that is quite unlikely on 64b unless I am missing.
It is good to be in sync here with the generic implementation though,
IMO.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> index 155ecbac9e28..b6d0c317639e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
> #include <asm/elf.h>
>
> #include "physaddr.h"
> @@ -220,6 +221,9 @@ bool mmap_address_hint_valid(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
> if (TASK_SIZE - len < addr)
> return false;
>
> + if (addr < mmap_min_addr)
> + return false;
> +
> return (addr > DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW) == (addr + len > DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW);

But is this one necessary? We do sanitze hint address before going to
get_unmapped_address AFAIR.

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-27 09:58    [W:0.080 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site