lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] Remove metag architecture
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:26:58AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38 AM, James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > So lets call it a day and drop the Meta architecture port from the
> > kernel. RIP Meta.
>
> Since I brought up the architecture removal independently, I could
> pick this up into a git tree that also has the removal of some of the
> other architectures.
>
> I see your tree is part of linux-next, so you could also just put it
> in there and send a pull request at the merge window if you prefer.
>
> The only real reason I see for a shared git tree would be to avoid
> conflicts when we touch the same Kconfig files or #ifdefs in driver,
> but Meta only appears in
>
> config FRAME_POINTER
> bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \
> (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || \
> SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || \
> ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
>
> and
>
> include/trace/events/mmflags.h:#elif defined(CONFIG_PARISC) ||
> defined(CONFIG_METAG) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
>
> so there is little risk.

I'm happy to put v2 in linux-next now (only patch 4 has changed, I just
sent an updated version), and send you a pull request early next week so
you can take it from there. The patches can't be directly applied with
git-am anyway thanks to the -D option to make them more concise.

Sound okay?

Thanks
James
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-23 12:03    [W:0.295 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site