[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:14:11AM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig <> wrote:
> > I'd love to see dead architecture ports dropped if they really are
> > more or less abandoned. In addition to your missing gcc port ones
> > above (minus openrisc) it seems like frv and m32r certainly qualify,
> > and xtensa seems to be going that way with the glibc port being dropped
> > now.
> It's not that it's been dropped, there have never been an official glibc
> port for xtensa, but we're working to get one.

Ah sorry - I meant to say tile not xtensa when writing this.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-22 19:05    [W:0.101 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site