lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when picking pages to free
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 03:21:44PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> When freeing a batch of pages from Per-CPU-Pages(PCP) back to buddy,
> the zone->lock is held and then pages are chosen from PCP's migratetype
> list. While there is actually no need to do this 'choose part' under
> lock since it's PCP pages, the only CPU that can touch them is us and
> irq is also disabled.
>
> Moving this part outside could reduce lock held time and improve
> performance. Test with will-it-scale/page_fault1 full load:
>
> kernel Broadwell(2S) Skylake(2S) Broadwell(4S) Skylake(4S)
> v4.15-rc4 9037332 8000124 13642741 15728686
> this patch 9608786 +6.3% 8368915 +4.6% 14042169 +2.9% 17433559 +10.8%
>
> What the test does is: starts $nr_cpu processes and each will repeatedly
> do the following for 5 minutes:
> 1 mmap 128M anonymouse space;
> 2 write access to that space;
> 3 munmap.
> The score is the aggregated iteration.
>
> https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/blob/master/tests/page_fault1.c
>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>

It looks like this series may have gotten lost because it was embedded
within an existing thread or else it was the proximity to the merge
window. I suggest a rebase, retest and resubmit unless there was some
major objection that I missed. Patch 1 is fine by me at least. I never
explicitly acked patch 2 but I've no major objection to it, just am a tad
uncomfortable with prefetch magic sauce in general.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-15 13:06    [W:0.092 / U:6.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site