lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] Static calls
>> On Dec 5, 2018, at 7:04 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Anyway, I have a new objection to Josh’s create_gap proposal: what on
>> Earth will kernel CET do to it? Maybe my longjmp-like hack is
>> actually better.
>
> Does CET even care about iret? I assumed it didn't. If it does, your
> proposal would have the same problem, no?

I think it doesn’t, but it doesn’t really matter. The shadow stack looks like:

retaddr of function being poked
call do_int3 + 5

And, to emulate a call, you need to stick a new frame right in the
middle. At least with a longjmp-like approach, you can clobber the
“call do_int3 + 5” part and then INCSSP on the way out. To be fair, I
think this also sucks.

PeterZ, can we abuse NMI to make this problem go away? I don't
suppose that we have some rule that NMI handlers never wait for other
CPUs to finish doing anything?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-06 00:36    [W:0.103 / U:20.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site