[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] memblock: Anonotate memblock_is_reserved() with __init_memblock.

On 2018/12/4 11:04, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:00:08AM +0000, Yueyi Li wrote:
>> Found warning:
>> WARNING: EXPORT symbol "gsi_write_channel_scratch" [vmlinux] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned.
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1e0a0): Section mismatch in reference from the function valid_phys_addr_range() to the function .init.text:memblock_is_reserved()
>> The function valid_phys_addr_range() references
>> the function __init memblock_is_reserved().
>> This is often because valid_phys_addr_range lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of memblock_is_reserved is wrong.
>> Use __init_memblock instead of __init.
> Not familiar with this error, the change looks good to me while have
> some questions.
> 1. I don't see valid_phys_addr_range() reference memblock_is_reserved().
> This is in which file or arch?

Yes, I modified valid_phys_addr_range() for some other debugging.

> 2. In case a function reference memblock_is_reserved(), should it has
> the annotation of __init_memblock too? Or just __init is ok? If my
> understanding is correct, annotation __init is ok. Well, I don't see
> valid_phys_addr_range() has an annotation.
> 3. The only valid_phys_addr_range() reference some memblock function is
> the one in arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c. Do we suppose to add an annotation to
> this?

Actually, __init_memblock is null in arch arm64, this warning is due to
CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH enabled, the help text in lib/Kconfig.debug.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-05 06:38    [W:0.134 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site