lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/kernel: Fix more -Wmissing-prototypes warnings
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Also, preferably the prototype should be eliminated via proper ordering
> of functions from lower level to higher levels.

Well, that trampoline_handler() is special as we call it from inline asm
and I see Masami has marked it __visible etc.

So doing this below still builds and the trampoline_handler doesn't get
discarded but maybe there's a reason for it not being static.

Masami?

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 6480056d370f..308bf103cc73 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@

#include "common.h"

-void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);

@@ -753,7 +751,7 @@ STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(kretprobe_trampoline);
/*
* Called from kretprobe_trampoline
*/
-__visible __used void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static __used void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp;
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-05 18:16    [W:0.093 / U:1.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site