lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v18 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:45 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:25:20PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:07 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 28/11/2018 16:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > Quoting Vivek Gautam (2018-11-27 02:11:41)
> > > >> @@ -1966,6 +1970,23 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
> > > >> };
> > > >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smmu_of_match);
> > > >>
> > > >> +static void arm_smmu_fill_clk_data(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> > > >> + const char * const *clks)
> > > >> +{
> > > >> + int i;
> > > >> +
> > > >> + if (smmu->num_clks < 1)
> > > >> + return;
> > > >> +
> > > >> + smmu->clks = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, smmu->num_clks,
> > > >> + sizeof(*smmu->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >> + if (!smmu->clks)
> > > >> + return;
> > > >> +
> > > >> + for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_clks; i++)
> > > >> + smmu->clks[i].id = clks[i];
> > > >
> > > > Is this clk_bulk_get_all()?
> >
> > From what I remember, and now I could go back to v7 and check [1], we parked
> > clk_bulk_get out of OF's sole purview as we also have
> > arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe() besides arm_smmu_device_dt_probe().
> >
> > arm_smmu_device_dt_probe() could get the clocks from dt and fill in
> > the clock bulk data, and
> > similarly, arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe() could fill the clock bulk data
> > by getting it from ACPI.
> >
> > clk_bulk_get_all() seems like going only the OF way.
> > Is there another way here to have something common between ACPI
> > and OF, and then do the clk_bulk_get?
>
> I'd say just go with clk_bulk_get_all() and if somebody really wants to
> mess with the SMMU clocks on a system booted via ACPI, then it's their
> problem to solve. My understanding is that the design of IORT makes this
> next to impossible to solve anyway, because a static table is used and
> therefore we're unable to run whatever ASL methods need to be invoked to
> mess with the clocks.

Sure then. I will respin this patch-series.

>
> Will



--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-03 07:44    [W:0.067 / U:8.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site