lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.19 036/142] netfilter: nf_conncount: use spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock
Date
4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit fd3e71a9f71e232181a225301a75936373636ccc ]

conn_free() holds lock with spin_lock() and it is called by both
nf_conncount_lookup() and nf_conncount_gc_list(). nf_conncount_lookup()
is called from bottom-half context and nf_conncount_gc_list() from
process context. So that spin_lock() call is not safe. Hence
conn_free() should use spin_lock_bh() instead of spin_lock().

test commands:
%nft add table ip filter
%nft add chain ip filter input { type filter hook input priority 0\; }
%nft add rule filter input meter test { ip saddr ct count over 2 } \
counter

splat looks like:
[ 461.996507] ================================
[ 461.998999] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[ 461.998999] 4.19.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted
[ 461.998999] --------------------------------
[ 461.998999] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[ 461.998999] kworker/0:2/134 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 461.998999] 00000000a71a559a (&(&list->list_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: conn_free+0x69/0x2b0 [nf_conncount]
[ 461.998999] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[ 461.998999] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[ 461.998999] nf_conncount_add+0x28a/0x520 [nf_conncount]
[ 461.998999] nft_connlimit_eval+0x401/0x580 [nft_connlimit]
[ 461.998999] nft_dynset_eval+0x32b/0x590 [nf_tables]
[ 461.998999] nft_do_chain+0x497/0x1430 [nf_tables]
[ 461.998999] nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x255/0x330 [nf_tables]
[ 461.998999] nf_hook_slow+0xb1/0x160
[ ... ]
[ 461.998999] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 461.998999] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 461.998999]
[ 461.998999] CPU0
[ 461.998999] ----
[ 461.998999] lock(&(&list->list_lock)->rlock);
[ 461.998999] <Interrupt>
[ 461.998999] lock(&(&list->list_lock)->rlock);
[ 461.998999]
[ 461.998999] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 461.998999]
[ ... ]

Fixes: 5c789e131cbb ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
index 02ca7df793f5..71b1f4f99580 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
@@ -106,15 +106,15 @@ nf_conncount_add(struct nf_conncount_list *list,
conn->zone = *zone;
conn->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
conn->jiffies32 = (u32)jiffies;
- spin_lock(&list->list_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&list->list_lock);
if (list->dead == true) {
kmem_cache_free(conncount_conn_cachep, conn);
- spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
return NF_CONNCOUNT_SKIP;
}
list_add_tail(&conn->node, &list->head);
list->count++;
- spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
return NF_CONNCOUNT_ADDED;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conncount_add);
@@ -132,10 +132,10 @@ static bool conn_free(struct nf_conncount_list *list,
{
bool free_entry = false;

- spin_lock(&list->list_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&list->list_lock);

if (list->count == 0) {
- spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
return free_entry;
}

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static bool conn_free(struct nf_conncount_list *list,
if (list->count == 0)
free_entry = true;

- spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
call_rcu(&conn->rcu_head, __conn_free);
return free_entry;
}
--
2.19.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-14 13:44    [W:0.506 / U:4.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site