lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:51 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:39 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > AFAICT, all the other proposed options seem to have major issues.
>
> I still absolutely detest this patch, and in fact it got worse from
> the test of the config variable.
>
> Honestly, the entry code being legible and simple is more important
> than the extra cycle from branching to a trampoline for static calls.
>
> Just don't do the inline case if it causes this much confusion.

With my entry maintainer hat on, I don't mind it so much, although the
implementation needs some work. The #ifdef should just go away, and
there should be another sanity check in the sanity check section.

Or we could replace that IPI with x86's bona fide serialize-all-cpus
primitive and then we can just retry instead of emulating. It's a
piece of cake -- we just trigger an SMI :) /me runs away.

--Andy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-30 21:19    [W:0.153 / U:3.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site