lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/24] leds: lt3593: Use led_compose_name()
From
Date
On 7/11/2018 8:49 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 08:37 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 6/11/2018 11:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Switch to using generic LED support for composing LED class
>>> device name.
>>
>> Thanks for the rework!
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
>>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c
>>> index de3623e..d005abc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c
>>> @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
>>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>> -#include <uapi/linux/uleds.h>
>>> +
>>> +#define LED_LT3593_NAME "lt3593"
>>>     struct lt3593_led_data {
>>> -    char name[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE];
>>>       struct led_classdev cdev;
>>>       struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
>>>   };
>>> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static int lt3593_led_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>       struct fwnode_handle *child;
>>>       int ret, state = LEDS_GPIO_DEFSTATE_OFF;
>>>       enum gpiod_flags flags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
>>> +    struct led_init_data init_data;
>>>       const char *tmp;
>>>         if (dev_get_platdata(dev)) {
>>> @@ -138,14 +139,11 @@ static int lt3593_led_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>           return PTR_ERR(led_data->gpiod);
>>>         child = device_get_next_child_node(dev, NULL);
>>> +    init_data.fwnode = child;
>>
>> Not quite following. `fwnode' is the only member of that struct that is
>> initialized?
>>
>>>   -    ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &tmp);
>>> -    if (ret < 0)
>>> -        snprintf(led_data->name, sizeof(led_data->name),
>>> -             "lt3593::");
>>> -    else
>>> -        snprintf(led_data->name, sizeof(led_data->name),
>>> -             "lt3593:%s", tmp);
>>> +    ret = led_compose_name(child, LED_LT3593_NAME, ":", init_data.name);
>>
>> ... and here, a member that wasn't written before is used? What am I
>> missing?
>
> init_data.name pointer is passed to led_compose_name(), which fills
> this array with the composed name.

Ah, that's the target. Stupid me!

With this:

Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>


Thanks,
Daniel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-08 09:33    [W:0.131 / U:4.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site