lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/2] sched/fair: update scale invariance of PELT
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 10:38, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/31/18 10:18 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Hi Dietmar,
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 08:20, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/26/18 6:11 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int cpu);
> >>> static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> >>> @@ -764,7 +763,7 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
> >>> * such that the next switched_to_fair() has the
> >>> * expected state.
> >>> */
> >>> - se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq);
> >>> + se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
> >>> return;
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>
> >> There is this 1/cpu scaling of se->avg.util_sum (running_sum) in
> >> update_tg_cfs_runnable() so it can be used to calculate
> >> se->avg.runnable_load_sum (runnable_sum). I guess with your approach
> >> this should be removed.
> >
> > Yes good catch
>
> Another thing, since you do not need the cpu parameter in
> accumulate_sum() anymore, you could also get rid of it in
> ___update_load_sum() and further in __update_load_avg_blocked_se(),
> __update_load_avg_cfs_rq() and __update_load_avg_se().

yes, I have to clean interface from reference to cpu

>
> Nitpick: The function header of update_cfs_rq_load_avg() mentions '@now:
> current time, as per cfs_rq_clock_task()' ... should mention
> cfs_rq_clock_pelt() instead.

ok

>
> [...]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-05 09:00    [W:0.083 / U:4.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site