lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] irq: fix support for allocating sets of IRQs
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Jens Axboe wrote:

Cc'ing Long with a hopefully working E-Mail address. The previous one
bounced because I stupidly copied the wrong one...

> On 11/4/18 5:02 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Jens,
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/2/18 8:59 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> Hi Jens,
> >>>
> >>> As I mentioned, there are at least two issues in the patch of '
> >>> irq: add support for allocating (and affinitizing) sets of IRQs':
> >>>
> >>> 1) it is wrong to pass 'mask + usedvec' to irq_build_affinity_masks()
> >>>
> >>> 2) we should spread all possible CPUs in 2-stage way on each set of IRQs
> >>>
> >>> The fix isn't trivial, and I introduce two extra patches as preparation,
> >>> then the implementation can be more clean.
> >>>
> >>> The patchset is against mq-maps branch of block tree, feel free to
> >>> integrate into the whole patchset of multiple queue maps.
> >>
> >> Thanks Ming, I ran this through my testing, and I end up with the
> >> same maps and affinities for all the cases I cared about. I'm going
> >> to drop my initial version, and add the three.
> >
> > So I assume, that I can pick up Mings series instead.
>
> Yes, let's do that.
>
> > There is another patch pending affecting the irq affinity spreading. Can
> > you folks please have a look at it?
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181102180248.13583-1-longli@linuxonhyperv.com
>
> I'll give that a look and test. Thanks for the heads-up.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-04 19:41    [W:0.073 / U:1.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site