[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/2] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification
On 11/29, Dave Martin wrote:
> SIGCHLD + wait() is immune to this problem for other child status
> notifications (albeit with higher overhead).
> Unless I've missed something fundamental, signals simply aren't a
> reliable data transport

Yes. But I hope we are not going to implement WCOREDUMP.

I am not fan of this patch, but at least it is simple.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-30 13:04    [W:0.175 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site