[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: WARN_ON() in netconsole with PREEMPT_RT

On 12.11.2018 03:01, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:16:00 +0100
> Oleksandr Natalenko <> wrote:
>> Oh, I see that write_msg() calls netpoll_send_udp() under
>> spin_lock_irqsave(), but in PREEMPT_RT this, AFAIK, does not disable
>> interrupts.
>> So, the real question here is whether the interrupts should be indeed
>> disabled. And if so, -rt should replace spin_lock_irqsave() call there
>> with what? local_irq_save()? and get rid of the warning?
> Why do we care if interrupts are disabled with PREEMPT_RT here?

I don't know, if you ask me. But the check was added intentionally with
c9fd56b34efd0, so the author had definitely something on his mind.
Cc'ing him.

> printk() itself has a lot of issues with PREEMPT_RT that we are working
> on dealing with. Right now netconsole is actually at the end of that
> todo list.

OK, I see.

Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-24 20:17    [W:0.053 / U:10.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site