[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Use DMA32 zone for page tables
On Fri 23-11-18 13:23:41, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/22/18 9:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > But I do agree with the sentiment of not wanting to spread GFP_DMA32
> > futher into the slab allocator.
> I don't see a problem with GFP_DMA32 for custom caches. Generic
> kmalloc() would be worse, since it would have to create a new array of
> kmalloc caches. But that's already ruled out due to the alignment.

Yes that makes quite a lot of sense to me. We do not really need a
generic support. Just make sure that if somebody creates a GFP_DMA32
restricted cache then allow allocating restricted memory from that.

Is there any fundamental reason that this wouldn't be possible?
Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-23 13:30    [W:0.082 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site