lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: STIBP by default.. Revert?
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> Which gets us back to Tim's fixup patch. Do you still prefer the revert,
> given the existence of that? I think that if Tim's fixup makes it through
> (it's currently missing SECCOMP handling, but that is trivial to add on
> top), it might be the best compromise. We'd also have have to make IBPB
> obey it to be consistent (and get even a few more % of performance back),
> but that's easy as well.

+1 for Tim's patch. That make us more consistent with how we handled
L1TF (giving the system owner a control knob to decide whether they
want this level of fixup, based on their own analysis of their vulnerability).

-Tony

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-18 23:37    [W:0.114 / U:6.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site