lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectApplied "regulator: core: Properly handle case where supply is the couple" to the regulator tree
Date
The patch

regulator: core: Properly handle case where supply is the couple

has been applied to the regulator tree at

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

From 089e2cc2e1861ad13a56811aa538419989346089 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:56:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Properly handle case where supply is the
couple

Check whether supply regulator is the couple to avoid infinite recursion
during of locking.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 47ccd35c7965..e46e53aa43db 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -233,6 +233,21 @@ void regulator_unlock(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
mutex_unlock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
}

+static bool regulator_supply_is_couple(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ struct regulator_dev *c_rdev;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 1; i < rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled; i++) {
+ c_rdev = rdev->coupling_desc.coupled_rdevs[i];
+
+ if (rdev->supply->rdev == c_rdev)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void regulator_unlock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
unsigned int n_coupled)
{
@@ -245,7 +260,7 @@ static void regulator_unlock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (!c_rdev)
continue;

- if (c_rdev->supply)
+ if (c_rdev->supply && !regulator_supply_is_couple(c_rdev))
regulator_unlock_recursive(
c_rdev->supply->rdev,
c_rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled);
@@ -283,7 +298,7 @@ static int regulator_lock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
*old_contended_rdev = NULL;
}

- if (c_rdev->supply) {
+ if (c_rdev->supply && !regulator_supply_is_couple(c_rdev)) {
err = regulator_lock_recursive(c_rdev->supply->rdev,
new_contended_rdev,
old_contended_rdev,
--
2.19.0.rc2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-19 14:11    [W:0.026 / U:0.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site