lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Qualcomm Synopsys High-Speed USB PHY binding
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:29 PM Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 09:13:38AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> <snip>
> > > > > +- qcom,init-seq:
> > > > > + Value type: <u32 array>
> > > > > + Definition: Should contain a sequence of <offset value delay> tuples to
> > > > > + program 'value' into phy register at 'offset' with 'delay'
> > > > > + in us afterwards.
> > > >
> > > > If we wanted this type of thing in DT, we'd have a generic binding (or
> > > > forth).
> > >
> > > Right now, this is a qualcomm usb phy specific bindings - first used in
> > > qcom,usb-hs-phy.txt and I extended it a bit for my phy. As this is not
> > > a so good hardware description, I'm a little hesitated to make it
> > > generic for other platforms to use in general. What about we put off it
> > > a little bit until we see more platforms need the same thing?
> >
> > I'm not saying I want it generic. Quite the opposite. I don't think we
> > should have it either generically or vendor specific. The main thing I
> > have a problem with is the timing information because then we're more
> > that just data. Without that we're talking about a bunch of properties
> > for register fields or just raw register values in DT. That becomes
> > more of a judgement call. There's not too much value in making a
> > driver translate a bunch of properties just to stuff them into
> > registers on init. But then just allowing any raw register value to be
> > in DT could be easily abused.
>
> Rob,
>
> I agree with your comments. Honestly, I'm not comfortable with this
> 'qcom,init-seq' thing in the first impression. The similar existence in
> mainline qcom,usb-hs-phy.txt makes me think it might be acceptable with
> the timing data added. Okay, I know your position on this now.
>
> @Sriharsha,
>
> Seeing that 'qcom,init-seq' is being configured with the exactly same
> values for both HS phys in SoC level dts file (qcs404.dtsi), I think
> such settings can be moved into driver code as SoC specific data.
> Unless you have a different view on this, I will do it with v4.

phy-qcom-qmp and phy-qcom-qusb2 have been maintaining such SoC specific
init sequences in the drivers if you would like to have pointers from them.

Thanks
Vivek

>
> Shawn



--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-19 08:11    [W:0.086 / U:17.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site