lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/6] tpm: dynamically allocate active_banks array
From
Date
Adding in CC Monty and Dave.


On 11/8/2018 2:46 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Orrayn Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:01:54PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> This patch removes the hard-coded limit of the active_banks array size.
>> It stores in the tpm_chip structure the number of active PCR banks,
>> determined in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(), and replaces the static array
>> with a pointer to a dynamically allocated array.
>>
>> As a consequence of the introduction of nr_active_banks, tpm_pcr_extend()
>> does not check anymore if the algorithm stored in tpm_chip is equal to
>> zero. The active_banks array always contains valid algorithms.
>>
>> Fixes: 1db15344f874 ("tpm: implement TPM 2.0 capability to get active
>> PCR banks")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 1 +
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 3 ++-
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> index 46caadca916a..2a9e8b744436 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>> kfree(chip->log.bios_event_log);
>> kfree(chip->work_space.context_buf);
>> kfree(chip->work_space.session_buf);
>> + kfree(chip->active_banks);
>> kfree(chip);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> index 1a803b0cf980..ba7ca6b3e664 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> @@ -1039,8 +1039,7 @@ static int tpm1_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash,
>> int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash)
>> {
>> int rc;
>> - struct tpm2_digest digest_list[ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks)];
>> - u32 count = 0;
>> + struct tpm2_digest *digest_list;
>> int i;
>>
>> chip = tpm_find_get_ops(chip);
>> @@ -1048,16 +1047,22 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash)
>> return -ENODEV;
>
> Should take digest_list as input. Probably callers could re-use the
> same digest_list array multiple times?

I plan to introduce a new structure with the digest size, as Monty
suggested at LSS. The name of the new structure is tpm_bank_list.

The benefit is that we don't have to rely on the TPM driver or the
crypto subsystem to find the digest size for the TPM algorithms
specified by the users of the TPM driver (it is not mandatory that the
users check the list of active banks).

It could happen that the TPM driver does not know the size of SHA256 if
the SHA256 bank was not allocated. Then, it has to search in the array
containing the mapping between TPM algorithm IDs and crypto IDs.

Since it is the user of the TPM driver that calculates the digest,
passing the digest size to tpm_pcr_extend() does not require too much
effort, and it also simplifies the TPM driver code.

Roberto


> Move struct tpm_chip to include/linux/tpm.h so that the caller can query
> nr_active_banks and active_banks and can create the digest array by
> itself. Lets do this right at once now that this is being restructured.
>
>>
>> if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
>> - memset(digest_list, 0, sizeof(digest_list));
>> + digest_list = kmalloc_array(chip->nr_active_banks,
>> + sizeof(*digest_list), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!digest_list)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks) &&
>> - chip->active_banks[i] != TPM2_ALG_ERROR; i++) {
>> + memset(digest_list, 0,
>> + chip->nr_active_banks * sizeof(*digest_list));
>
> You should use kcalloc() to allocate digest_list.
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_active_banks; i++) {
>> digest_list[i].alg_id = chip->active_banks[i];
>> memcpy(digest_list[i].digest, hash, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE);
>> - count++;
>> }
>>
>> - rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(chip, pcr_idx, count, digest_list);
>> + rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(chip, pcr_idx, chip->nr_active_banks,
>> + digest_list);
>> + kfree(digest_list);
>> tpm_put_ops(chip);
>> return rc;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>> index f3501d05264f..98368c3a6ff7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>> @@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ struct tpm_chip {
>> const struct attribute_group *groups[3];
>> unsigned int groups_cnt;
>>
>> - u16 active_banks[7];
>> + u32 nr_active_banks;
>> + u16 *active_banks;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle;
>> char ppi_version[TPM_PPI_VERSION_LEN + 1];
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>> index c31b490bd41d..533089cede07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ int tpm2_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, u32 count,
>> int i;
>> int j;
>>
>> - if (count > ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks))
>> + if (count > chip->nr_active_banks)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND);
>> @@ -859,7 +859,6 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> void *marker;
>> void *end;
>> void *pcr_select_offset;
>> - unsigned int count;
>> u32 sizeof_pcr_selection;
>> u32 rsp_len;
>> int rc;
>> @@ -878,11 +877,14 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> if (rc)
>> goto out;
>>
>> - count = be32_to_cpup(
>> + chip->nr_active_banks = be32_to_cpup(
>> (__be32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 5]);
>>
>> - if (count > ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks)) {
>> - rc = -ENODEV;
>> + chip->active_banks = kmalloc_array(chip->nr_active_banks,
>> + sizeof(*chip->active_banks),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!chip->active_banks) {
>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -891,7 +893,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> rsp_len = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[2]);
>> end = &buf.data[rsp_len];
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_active_banks; i++) {
>> pcr_select_offset = marker +
>> offsetof(struct tpm2_pcr_selection, size_of_select);
>> if (pcr_select_offset >= end) {
>> @@ -908,9 +910,6 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> }
>>
>> out:
>> - if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks))
>> - chip->active_banks[i] = TPM2_ALG_ERROR;
>> -
>> tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
>>
>> return rc;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
> /Jarkko
>

--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-13 14:54    [W:0.235 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site