lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/2] RISC-V: A proposal to add vendor-specific code
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 07:17:45AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:46:10PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > I agree that we need a place for vendor-specific ISA extensions and
> > having vendor-specific directories is also good.
>
> The only sensible answer is that we should not allow vendor specific
> extensions in the kernel at all. ...

How can this even be possible if a extension includes an extra register
set as some domain-specific context? In such a case, kernel should
at least process the context during any context switch, just like how it
deals with the FP context.

> ... We need to standardize cache flushing
> and we need to do it soon and not introduce horrible bandaids because
> the foundation did not do its work.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-01 01:56    [W:0.120 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site