lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses
Date
Hi Josh,

On Tuesday, 9 October 2018 21:56:23 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:29:24PM +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
> > Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2018, 08:20:44 schrieb Josh Triplett:
> >> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 02:36:39PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >>> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers
> >>> publishing private information such as email addresses unacceptable
> >>> behaviour. Since the Linux kernel collects and publishes email
> >>> addresses as part of the patch process, add an exception clause for
> >>> email addresses ordinarily collected by the project to correct this
> >>> ambiguity.
> >>
> >> Upstream has now adopted a FAQ, which addresses this and many other
> >> questions. See https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq .
> >>
> >> Might I suggest adding that link to the bottom of the document, instead?
> >> (And then, optionally, submitting entries for that FAQ.)
> >
> > The Code of Conflict has 28 lines, including the heading.
> > The Code of Conduct has 81 lines, including the heading. And it needs a
> > FAQ. Hm.
>
> Yes, it turns out to be a more complicated problem than it was
> previously oversimplified to. People don't automatically share a common
> understanding.

I see an elephant in the room in the fact that we have carefully avoided
discussing whether people share a common goal here :-/

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-09 21:39    [W:0.570 / U:2.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site