lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 1/3]: perf util: map data buffer for preserving collected data
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:14:29AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:

SNIP

> static int overwrite_rb_find_range(void *buf, int mask, u64 *start, u64 *end)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mmap.h b/tools/perf/util/mmap.h
> index e603314dc792..1b63b6cc7cf9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mmap.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mmap.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <asm/barrier.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
> +#include <aio.h>
> +#endif
> #include "auxtrace.h"
> #include "event.h"
>
> @@ -26,6 +29,11 @@ struct perf_mmap {
> bool overwrite;
> struct auxtrace_mmap auxtrace_mmap;
> char event_copy[PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE] __aligned(8);
> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
> + void *data;
> + struct aiocb cblock;
> + int nr_cblocks;
> +#endif

could you please separate those in struct, maybe anonymous like:

...
struct {
void *data;
struct aiocb cblock;
int nr_cblocks;
} aio;
...


> };
>
> /*
> @@ -59,6 +67,9 @@ enum bkw_mmap_state {
> struct mmap_params {
> int prot, mask;
> struct auxtrace_mmap_params auxtrace_mp;
> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
> + int nr_cblocks;
> +#endif

I dont think we need the ifdef here.. IMO one extra int is not
worth of the ifdef endif confusion

jirka

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-08 12:51    [W:0.187 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site