lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: fix up nowarn confusion in the dma mapping layer
Any comments on these rather trivial patches?

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 01:12:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series sorts out how we deal with the nowarn flags in the dma
> mapping code. We still support __GFP_NOWARN for the legacy APIs that
> don't support passing the dma specific flags, but we generally want
> every implementation to actually check DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN instead.
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
---end quoted text---

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-08 09:04    [W:0.045 / U:2.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site