[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Input: mousedev - add a schedule point in mousedev_write()
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 12:34:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:59:49AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:47:49AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > syzbot was able to trigger rcu stalls by calling write()
> > > with large number of bytes.
> > >
> > > Add a cond_resched() in the loop to avoid this.
> >
> > I think this simply masks a deeper issue. The code fetches characters
> > from userspace in a loop, takes a lock, quickly places response in an
> > output buffer, and releases interrupt. I do not see why this should
> > cause stalls as we do not hold spinlock/interrupts off for extended
> > period of time.
> >
> > Adding Paul so he can straighten me out...
> If you are running a !PREEMPT kernel, then you need the cond_resched()
> to allow the scheduler to choose someone else to run if needed and
> to let RCU know that grace periods can end. Without the cond_resched(),
> if you stay in that loop long enough you will get excessive scheduling
> latencies and eventually even RCU CPU stall warning splats.
> In a PREEMPT (instead of !PREEMPT) kernel, you would be right. When
> preemption is enabled, the scheduler can preempt and RCU can sense
> lack of readers from the scheduling-clock interrupt handler. Which
> is why cond_resched() is nothingness in a PREEMPT kernel.
> But because people run !PREEMPT as well as PREEMPT kernels, if that loop
> can run for a long time, you need that cond_resched().

OK, I see. I'll apply the patch then.

I think evdev.c needs similar treatment as it will keep looping while
there is data...



 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-05 00:55    [W:0.069 / U:2.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site