[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 04/10] x86: refcount: prevent gcc distortions
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:31:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nadav Amit <> wrote:
> > > Are you using defconfig or a reasonable distro-config for your tests?
> >
> > I think it is best to take the kernel and run localyesconfig for testing.
> Ok, agreed - and this makes the numbers you provided pretty representative.
> Good - now that all of my concerns were addressed I'd like to merge the remaining 3 patches as
> well - but they are conflicting with ongoing x86 work in tip:x86/core. The extable conflict is
> trivial, the jump-label conflict a bit more involved.

FWIW, gcc guys are not too averse to the idea of enhancing gcc inline
asm syntax with a statement which specifies its size so that gcc can use
it to do better inlining cost estimation than counting lines.

Lemme work the process ...


Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-05 13:21    [W:0.189 / U:11.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site