Messages in this thread |  | | From | Ulf Hansson <> | Date | Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:58:53 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) |
| |
On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I >> have a plan for how to move forward. >> >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes, >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily. >> >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8. > > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that?
Yes, please.
> > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the > PSCI-related ones need ACKs.
For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.
Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.
Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack from Daniel)
Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.
Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.
Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.
Kind regards Uffe
|  |