lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset)
On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat
>> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I
>> have a plan for how to move forward.
>>
>> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided
>> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete
>> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes,
>> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily.
>>
>> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's
>> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8.
>
> I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I
> can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that?

Yes, please.

>
> As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the
> PSCI-related ones need ACKs.

For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.

Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.

Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack
from Daniel)

Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.

Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.

Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.

Kind regards
Uffe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-04 10:59    [W:0.345 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site