[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Mark Rutland wrote:

> I guess skipping the original function prologue would simplify the
> implementation of the replacement function (and would mean that the regs
> held the function arguments per the procedure call standard), but AFAICT
> other architectures aren't relying on that, so it doesn't seem to be a
> strict requirement.
> What am I missing?
> How does livepatching handle the pre-mcount function preambles on
> architectures with existing support?

Other architectures do rely on that. That's exactly for example why on x86
we use '-pg -mfentry', to make sure we hook the function *before*


Jiri Kosina

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-31 14:20    [W:0.086 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site