Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Moger, Babu" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] arch/x86: AMD QoS support | Date | Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:09:16 +0000 |
| |
On 10/03/2018 01:52 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 07:16:23PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote: >> >> >> On 10/02/2018 01:46 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:44:47PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote: >>>> Hi Fenghua, >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 12:07 PM >>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 07:18:54PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote: >>>>>> The public specification is still in works. Will add the link when it is >>>>>> available. >>>>> >>>>> Is this the public AMD QoS spec? >>>>> https://support.amd.com/TechDocs/56375_Quality_of_Service_Extensions. >>>>> pdf >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. That is the one. >>>> I was going to send the link after refreshing the patches on 4-19-rc5. You already got it. Please let know if you have any feedback on the patches. >>> >>> I don't see the name 'RDT' (Resource Director Technology) in the >>> spec "AMD64 Technology Platform Quality of Service Extensions". >>> Does AMD use the same name 'RDT' as Intel? >> >> No. AMD uses the word "Platform Quality of Service"(or in short QoS) to >> refer this feature. > > Hi, Thomas, Babu, and James, > > Can we use "resctrl" to replace "intel_rdt" and "rdt" in kernel? "resctrl" > is a neutral name and has been used in user interface already. Hopefully > "resctrl" can be acceptable by ARM, AMD, and Intel. We only use "intel_rdt", > "amd_qos", or "arm mpam" for vendor specific code.
Yes. resctrl seems like a reasonable name. > > Can we move all of Intel RDT, AMD QoS, and ARM MPAM code into a generic > place fs/resctrl where both ARM and X86 code can stay?
Looking at the James patches, I thought he is going in the same(or similar) direction eventually.
> > Thanks. > > -Fenghua >
|  |