lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [LINUX PATCH v11 3/3] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add support for Arasan NAND Flash Controller
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:50:31 +0530
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> wrote:

> +static int anfc_zero_len_page_write_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + const struct nand_subop *subop)
> +{
> + const struct nand_op_instr *instr;
> + struct anfc_nand_chip *achip = to_anfc_nand(chip);
> + struct anfc_nand_controller *nfc = to_anfc(chip->controller);
> + unsigned int op_id;
> + struct anfc_op nfc_op = {};
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> + u32 addrcycles;
> +
> + anfc_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &nfc_op);
> + nfc->prog = PROG_PGRD;
> + instr = nfc_op.data_instr;
> + op_id = nfc_op.data_instr_idx;
> +
> + addrcycles = achip->raddr_cycles + achip->caddr_cycles;
> +
> + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmds[0], NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG, 1,

Why are the second opcode and the number of address cycles hardcoded.
That's simply not future-proof, and I don't want that. Also, I don't
understand why you do that, you have all the information you need in
subop and you keep guessing some parameters.

> + mtd->writesize, addrcycles);
> + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-03 21:47    [W:0.142 / U:1.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site