Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:45:01 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf |
| |
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > On 9/29/2018 10:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Reinette, > > > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > >> I interpreted Thomas and Peter's responses to mean that there are no > >> objections for this to be included in v4.19 as a fix. > >> > >> If I understand the tip branches correctly the core patch seems to be > >> headed to v4.19 while the rest (excluding the final patch > >> "x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements") are headed to v4.20. > >> > >> Have you decided against including this into v4.19 or did I > >> misunderstand the responses and/or branches? > > > > I did not decide anything yet. It's not going into -rc6 as it's not yet > > through next and the other standard testing. > > > > I'm also looking at the other set of RDT fixes, which obviously want to go > > as well. So not sure how to deal with all of that. > > > > When you do deal with this series could you please also include the > final patch ("x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements")? I > noticed that patches 1/6 to 5/6 have been merged into x86/cache in > tip.git and then some other work on top of it. It is not clear to me why > 6/6 was omitted and this fix does require it.
Hmm. That was not intentional. /me goes to rumage around.
Thanks,
tglx
|  |