lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 10:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Reinette,
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >> I interpreted Thomas and Peter's responses to mean that there are no
> >> objections for this to be included in v4.19 as a fix.
> >>
> >> If I understand the tip branches correctly the core patch seems to be
> >> headed to v4.19 while the rest (excluding the final patch
> >> "x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements") are headed to v4.20.
> >>
> >> Have you decided against including this into v4.19 or did I
> >> misunderstand the responses and/or branches?
> >
> > I did not decide anything yet. It's not going into -rc6 as it's not yet
> > through next and the other standard testing.
> >
> > I'm also looking at the other set of RDT fixes, which obviously want to go
> > as well. So not sure how to deal with all of that.
> >
>
> When you do deal with this series could you please also include the
> final patch ("x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements")? I
> noticed that patches 1/6 to 5/6 have been merged into x86/cache in
> tip.git and then some other work on top of it. It is not clear to me why
> 6/6 was omitted and this fix does require it.

Hmm. That was not intentional. /me goes to rumage around.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-03 21:45    [W:0.055 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site