lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ALSA: intel8x0: Fix fall-through annotations
Date


On 10/3/18 6:19 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:08:07 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 12:38:36 +0200,
>> Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>
>>> Replace "fallthru" with a proper "fall through" annotation.
>>>
>>> This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>>
>> Thanks, applied.
>
> BTW, does "fallthru" really cause a warning? I thought it's also
> accepted as well as "fall-through". At least, my gcc-8 doesn't give a
> warning with "fallthru".
>

You are correct. It does not trigger a warning.

There are about 50 similar instances in the whole codebase. And, as they
are just a few, what I'm trying to do is to replace them with the most
commonly used form: "fall through"

Thanks
--
Gustavo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-03 20:14    [W:0.040 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site