lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] spi: slave: Fix missing break in switch
Hi Gustavo,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:05 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
> On 10/3/18 5:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> >
> >>> case CMD_REBOOT:
> >>> dev_info(&priv->spi->dev, "Rebooting system...\n");
> >>> kernel_restart(NULL);
> >>> + break;
> >
> >> Alternatively, kernel_restart() and friends could be marked __noreturn.
> >
> > Yes, that seems more sensible though there's no harm in this patch even
> > with that. It'd definitely avoid other issues in future.
>
> I'll include the __noreturn in addition to the break statement.
> I'll send v2 shortly.

Please note that adding __noreturn is not a trivial task, due to the complex
call chains, and the different implementations on the various architectures
and platforms. So that will be a big patch series.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-03 17:11    [W:0.039 / U:5.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site