Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices | From | Bart Van Assche <> | Date | Wed, 03 Oct 2018 07:58:52 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 05:51 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 07:42:15AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote: > > Of note also is that host-managed like sequential zone devices are also likely > > to show up soon with the work being done in the NVMe standard on the new "Zoned > > namespace" feature proposal. These devices will also require a scheduler like > > mq-deadline guaranteeing per-zone in-order delivery of sequential write > > requests. Looking only at the number of queues of the device is not enough to > > choose the best (most reasonnable/appropriate) scheduler. > > We actually have a plan to avoid the need for a non-reordering scheduler > there (including a Linux prototype for it). Lets see if it survives the > committee.
Has the work with the T10 committee to standardize the SCSI equivalent of anonymous writes already started?
Thanks,
Bart.
|  |