Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | [PATCH 6/6] cpuidle: menu: Move the latency_req == 0 special case check | Date | Tue, 02 Oct 2018 23:47:43 +0200 |
| |
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is better to always update data->bucket before returning from menu_select() so as to prevent disturbing the wakeup statistics collected by the governor, so combine the latency_req == 0 special check with the more general check below.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> --- drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c @@ -297,19 +297,13 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr data->needs_update = 0; } - /* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */ - if (unlikely(latency_req == 0)) { - *stop_tick = false; - return 0; - } - /* determine the expected residency time, round up */ data->next_timer_us = ktime_to_us(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(&delta_next)); get_iowait_load(&nr_iowaiters, &cpu_load); data->bucket = which_bucket(data->next_timer_us, nr_iowaiters); - if (unlikely(drv->state_count <= 1) || + if (unlikely(drv->state_count <= 1 || latency_req == 0) || ((data->next_timer_us < drv->states[1].target_residency || latency_req < drv->states[1].exit_latency) && !drv->states[0].disabled && !dev->states_usage[0].disable)) {
|  |